• Home
  • About Me
  • The List
  • THE LIST (2016 Update)
  • THE LIST (2017 Update)
  • THE LIST (2018 Update)
  • THE LIST (2019 Update)
  • THE LIST (2020 Update)
  • THE LIST (2021 Update)
  • THE LIST (2022 Update)
  • Top Twelves and More
  • The End Credits Song Hall of Fame

Rhyme and Reason

~ Poetry Meets Film Reviews

Rhyme and Reason

Tag Archives: History

Bonnie and Clyde (1967)

19 Saturday Apr 2025

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Classics, Drama, History, Romance, Thriller

(For Day 19 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was for a story poem “in the style of a blues song or ballad,” and the mention of crimes and murder ballads brought to mind this classic.)

The money could run and the tellers could hide,
But that meant fun for Bonnie and Clyde.
Never was a danger from which they shied.
Ride or die were Bonnie and Clyde.

The banks would quail at the loss of pride,
Left in the trail of Bonnie and Clyde.
Withdrawals like theirs couldn’t be denied;
Ride or die were Bonnie and Clyde.

Warn all the wimps and stay inside
If you get a glimpse of Bonnie and Clyde.
Quick with a trigger and wild-eyed,
Ride or die were Bonnie and Clyde.

Gotta get caught to be cuffed and tried,
And they were not, not Bonnie and Clyde.
Famed and feared both far and wide,
Ride or die were Bonnie and Clyde.

King and queen of the homicide,
None came between ol’ Bonnie and Clyde.
Couldn’t last long till they lost their stride;
Ride and die did Bonnie and Clyde.
_______________________

MPA rating: R (for violence, though closer to PG-13 by today’s standards)

I saw Bonnie and Clyde more out of deference for its reputation than personal interest, since I’m not typically a fan of crime films known for their violence. (This was before the passing of Gene Hackman that made the recent watch even more worthwhile.) But I was very pleasantly surprised.

Faye Dunaway’s Bonnie Parker and Warren Beatty’s Clyde Barrow are quintessential anti-heroes, earning sympathy with their romantic chemistry and Depression-relevant targeting of banks yet allowing their bad choices to spiral further and further into infamy. They eventually form a gang with Clyde’s brother Buck (Hackman), Buck’s excitable wife Blanche (Estelle Parsons), and a mechanic accomplice C. W. Moss (Michael J. Pollard), terrorizing the countryside and evading the law, for a while at least.

The film is full of little moments that make the characters more than one-dimensional villains, like the head-butting between Bonnie and Blanche or the brief kidnapping of a young couple (including Gene Wilder in his film debut) that reveals Bonnie’s aversion to any reminder of death. Bonnie’s brief reunion with her mother (Mabel Cavitt, a local extra chosen for the role) especially brings home how much their crime spree has ruined a chance at a normal life, something with which they may never have been satisfied anyway. I also quite liked the inclusion of a poem the real Bonnie Parker wrote about themselves, which would have made my Poems in Movies list had I known about it then.

Bonnie and Clyde is famous for its taboo-breaking depiction of violence, though it’s quite tame compared with even TV shows these days, and it serves the story well, especially in the famous final scene. The film is also beautifully shot, and all the major performances excel and were Oscar-nominated, though Estelle Parsons (probably the weakest link) was the only one to win, along with the cinematography. Combining history, romance, and tragedy, Bonnie and Clyde certainly deserves its status as a classic.

Best line: (Clyde, responding to Bonnie’s poem) “You know what you done there? You told my story, you told my whole story right there, right there. One time, I told you I was gonna make you somebody. That’s what you done for me. You made me somebody they’re gonna remember.”

Rank: List Runner-Up

© 2025 S.G. Liput
806 Followers and Counting

The Private Life of Henry VIII (1933)

09 Wednesday Apr 2025

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Classics, Drama, History

(For Day 8 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was for a ghazal, typically a love poem formed by couplets ending with the same word and a self-reference at the end.)

Rich as king and rollicking, I share my heart too easily;
Men may fill the chess board, but I do so love a woman.

The loyal kind that hold the faith despite the politics and pleas,
The kind that seize the title of queen – I do so love a woman.

The flirty kind that mince around, ambition mixed with delicacy,
Wise enough to not lose one’s head – I do so love a woman.

The selfless kind that give and give, but take themselves whene’er they flee,
And haunt your thoughts they once had filled – I do so love a woman.

The clever kind, whose minds outshine their outer physiognomy,
Who play to win to men’s chagrin – I do so love a woman.

The gorgeous kind who cannot help but capture every heart they see,
But don’t go keeping secrets, no… I do so love a woman.

The pious kind who care so true and stay unto the end with thee,
No doubt they’re blessed to outlive the rest – I do so love a woman.

My senses fail with a sweet female, the face, the grace, the repartee…
Come now, Henry, how can one choose that single, perfect woman?
_______________________________

MPA rating: Passed (pretty much G)

The older a film is, the harder it can be to cling to one’s claimed status as a cinefile, but there are still worthwhile movies among the overacting and poor sound quality common to the early era. Charles Laughton’s Oscar-winning role as the title king in The Private Life of Henry VIII did much to shape the popular image of Henry as gluttonous, immature, and volatile, and, while I understand not all of it is historically accurate, he does make for a quintessential portrayal of the infamous monarch.

Leaving Catherine of Aragon as a footnote, the film starts with the execution of Anne Boleyn (Merle Oberon) before cycling through the doomed Jane Seymour (Wendy Barrie), the shrewd Anne of Cleves (Elsa Lanchester), the adulterous Katherine Howard (Binnie Barnes), and finally the uptight Catherine Parr (Everley Gregg). Anne of Cleves gets the best interactions as she proves to be a match of wits with Henry in an ever more expensive card game, while Laughton’s anguished reaction to the revelation of Howard’s cheating is surprisingly poignant, making you almost forget about the real Henry’s rampant unfaithfulness. With its age very apparent, though, The Private Life of Henry VIII is more of a one-time watch than a potential favorite; I’d rather listen to the soundtrack of Six any day.

Best line: (Henry VIII) “Love is drunkenness when one is young. Love is wisdom when one is at my age.”

Rank: Honorable Mention

© 2025 S.G. Liput
805 Followers and Counting

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare (2024)

02 Wednesday Apr 2025

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Action, History, Thriller, War

(For Day 2 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was for a poem that directly addresses someone and includes elements like an unusual simile and an anachronism. As you may guess, the addressee here is some WWII Nazis taken by surprise.)

I say, chaps, don’t gawp at me like you’re in shock;
You knew this was coming (or should have at least).
You can’t go around gobbling up the whole bloc
And starting up wars on the west and the east.

It truly was only a matter of time
Before some resourceful dissenters arrived
To answer each war crime with, well, even more crime
Until your dear Reich has been quite unalived.

You looked oh so smug in your grey uniforms,
That swastika bent like a crime scene in chalk,
But you lie with the devil, then you get the horns,
A regular arsenal, loaded and cocked.

So don’t be so stunned by the Colt in your face;
It’s not so irregular when you come to it.
There’s action that’s needed when Nazis give chase,
And always somebody, like us, who will do it.
____________________

MPA rating:  R (for strong violence)

Based on a Damien Lewis book about Churchill’s secret Special Operations Executive (SOE), The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare sees director Guy Ritchie leaning into that cinematic axiom that Nazis make the best villains and by extension the best victims. At the height of World War II, debonaire commando Gus March-Phillips (Henry Cavill) is recruited by one Brigadier Gubbins (Cary Elwes) and tasked with forming an elite espionage team to target Nazi operations with sabotage and guerilla warfare. Joined by a savage Dane (Alan Ritchson), an expert frogman (Henry Golding), and others, the team sets out to destroy an Italian supply ship in what would be known as Operation Postmaster.

The history of the SOE and the feats of the real-life war heroes are undoubtedly interesting, but this is obviously the Hollywood version of events. The film revels in its chance to dispatch Nazis with every sharp instrument at hand, yet, despite the danger involved, the action is so one-sided that there’s rarely any suspense for the fates of the main characters. That’s a shame too, because Cavill has an effortless charisma as the leader of the pack, complemented by the cool but ferocious Ritchson, and their characters might have shone even more with a slightly less glamorized script.

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare makes popcorn entertainment out of an under-publicized chapter of WWII history, and it does so reasonably well. From the undercover seductions of Eiza González to the shoot-em-up carnage of a tropical rescue mission, it’s sometimes brutal fun, but it also feels like empty calories in a way such intriguing history shouldn’t.

Best line: (Churchill) “If Hitler isn’t playing by the Rules, then neither shall we?”

Rank: Honorable Mention

© 2025 S.G. Liput
803 Followers and Counting

Oppenheimer (2023)

30 Tuesday Apr 2024

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Biopic, Drama, History

(For the final day of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was for a poem in which the speaker is identified with a mythological figure. It may be on the nose, but I had to go with the “American Prometheus” himself.)

American Prometheus, they name me,
The man who stole the fire from the gods,
Never returned.
Shall I justify my actions
As the fairest of the factions
That ignited chain reactions
And left everybody burned?
I was spurned.
For no good deed goes unpunished
While the bad are not admonished,
And you’d frankly be astonished
At how in-between deeds fare.
I was there,
Leading teams so complex,
Daring dreams of what is next,
All for loyal intellects,
Intent to see the fire burst.
What is worse,
That I built this capability
Employed to end hostility
Or shirked responsibility
For everything it cost?
I am lost
In my chains, writ in ink,
Where the eagles barely blink,
As I think and I drink
And I offer up my liver to atone
For what I’ve sown.
_____________________________

MPA rating:  R (for language and nudity)

This review certainly feels overdue! While everyone was hopping on the Barbenheimer bandwagon last year, I stuck with the more serious half of that mash-up, Christopher Nolan’s ambitious biopic of the “father of the atomic bomb.” Based on the biography American Prometheus, this film would have been very different in more conventional hands. I can envision a version of it that follows the chronological events of J. Robert Oppenheimer’s life and climaxes with the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, perhaps followed by a final scene where he grieves his role in the war and a footnote about how he was effectively disowned by the government. That might have been a great movie on its own, but it’s too pedestrian for Nolan, who instead created a non-linear epic to view Oppenheimer’s life and work from as many angles as possible.

In the role for which he will likely most be remembered, Oscar winner Cillian Murphy epitomizes J. Robert Oppenheimer in all his genius, hubris, and folly. From his time as a physics student admiring Niels Bohr (Kenneth Branagh) to his romantic rendezvous with Communist connections (Florence Pugh, Emily Blunt) to his being approached by General Leslie Groves (Matt Damon) to lead the Manhattan Project and beat the Germans to the atomic bomb, the film presents Oppenheimer as level-headed yet prone to bad choices, aware of his own limitations yet confident in his expertise. By itself, this is the film that Oppenheimer could have been, and Murphy still would have excelled in it.

But interspersed with the scientist’s road to fame are scenes of later bureaucratic proceedings, including Oppenheimer’s security clearance hearing in 1954 and the Senate confirmation hearing of former Admiral Lewis Strauss (Oscar-winning Robert Downey, Jr.) for Secretary of Commerce in 1959. Though these parts can threaten to be dry, they offer a wealth of clues pertaining to Oppenheimer’s work and beliefs, how others viewed him, and the underhanded tactics used to besmirch suspected Communist sympathizers at the time. After years of struggling and building an impromptu town at Los Alamos, the testing of the first atom bomb in the New Mexico desert would understandably be the high point of the film, and indeed it made a friend of mine tear up in the theater with the grandeur of the historic explosion (made more impressive by not using CGI, according to Nolan). Yet this moment oddly serves as a false climax around two-thirds into the three-hour runtime, and Nolan instead manages to make those bureaucratic sessions into a riveting culmination of all that’s come before. It still may feel anticlimactic to some, but Nolan pulls it off better than anyone else could.

It’s hard to believe that Christopher Nolan had never won an Oscar before this film, considering his reputation for smart blockbusters. As much as I loved The Holdovers, I celebrated Oppenheimer’s seven Oscar wins last month, including Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Score, Best Cinematography, and especially Best Supporting Actor. (Like Brendan Fraser the year before, I’m so glad Robert Downey, Jr., has proven his talent beyond his action movie days.) If the Academy had gotten around to adding the Best Casting category this year, I’m sure that Oppenheimer would have won that too, since its huge cast is full of recognizable stars, even in mere cameos, including Rami Malek, Casey Affleck, Jason Clarke, Alden Ehrenreich, Josh Hartnett, and Gary Oldman.

With its convoluted method of presenting Oppenheimer’s story, the film is perhaps not the most accessible or entertaining of biopics, and I could have done without a few unnecessary nude scenes trying to justify its R rating. Its presentation of President Truman and the women in Oppenheimer’s life is far from flattering, and some complaints are also valid about how it omits Japanese perspectives of the bombings or the Native Americans and downwinders living around the bomb testing site. Yet any single movie can only present so much, and it’s hard to imagine a biographical film that is more comprehensive in its exploration of one man’s life and impact. Inception remains my favorite Christopher Nolan film, but Oppenheimer is a masterful history lesson and a well-deserved peak for his career as a filmmaker, one that I hope he can continue to top in future efforts.

Best line: (Kitty Oppenheimer, in a context different from the bomb’s development but no less applicable) “You don’t get to commit sin and then ask all of us to feel sorry for you when there are consequences.”

Rank:  List-Worthy

© 2024 S.G. Liput
796 Followers and Counting

Lincoln (2012)

20 Saturday Apr 2024

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Biopic, Drama, History

(For Day 20 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was for a poem that recounts a historical event. Perhaps it becomes too abstract here, but I was inspired by this film and the passing of the 13th Amendment.)

“All men are created equal.” How simple! How fair!
Yet full of bull exceptions from the start.
While for decades, we disputed
Who exactly “all” included,
Each amendment added justice a la carte.

With the Civil War near-over, it hinged upon one vote
Whether slavery was truly at an end.
The Radicals were egging
On the timid, even begging
For the courage to be willing to offend.

For offense was unavoidable with rampant opposition.
There was no opinion free of vitriol.
But the President’s supporters
Had resolved to get three quarters
Of the states to redefine their use of “all.”

It bewilders modern senses that freedom was contentious,
That worth was based on race and shade of skin,
But this was second nature
To the warring legislature
In which the new amendment had to win.

Agreement is impossible for monolithic sides,
But single individuals can sway
Their moral qualms, if any,
And the future fates of many
If only they know justice won’t delay.
________________________

MPA rating:  PG-13

It was just a few months ago that I said in my last blogiversary post that Lincoln narrowly missed out on being List-Worthy but might make the cut with another watch. Well, just revisiting some scenes for this review made me realize this historical masterpiece from Spielberg deserves its place in my Top 365. Based on Doris Kearns Goodwin’s biography Team of Rivals, the film encapsulates the last four months of Abraham Lincoln’s life, particularly the hard-fought battle in the House of Representatives to get the 13th Amendment approved before the Civil War’s end.

My main complaint after seeing Lincoln was how dense and talky it can get with its closed-door strategy meetings and political maneuvering, but then again, it’s remarkable how well it conveys its messages with so many characters and agendas in play. No surprise, but the film’s greatest asset is Daniel Day-Lewis in the title role, a native Brit disappearing completely into the iconic American President. The voice, the weariness, the righteous indignation, the political acumen, the moments of folksy wisdom shared with his subordinates – with every scene, he proves how much he deserved that third Best Actor Oscar.

Yet he also leaves room for others to shine, a cavalcade of excellent supporting roles filled by both established and rising stars, from Colman Domingo and David Oyelowo in the excellent opening scene, to the likes of David Strathairn, Hal Holbrook, Michael Stuhlbarg, Walton Goggins, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Jared Harris, and Adam Driver. As far as Oscar-nominated roles, Sally Field is good as the overwrought Mary Todd Lincoln, but Tommy Lee Jones is a hoot as Radical Republican leader Thaddeus Stevens, a role that probably would have won him Best Supporting Actor if not up against Christoph Waltz for Django Unchained.

Lincoln is a showcase of talent at every level, from its layered portrayal of Washington politics and a script both subtle and on-the-nose to its array of skilled actors making the most of every scene. I tend to think Lincoln wouldn’t have used profanity as he does here, but otherwise, Day-Lewis’s performance will surely go down as the definitive cinematic portrayal of the 16th President.

Best line: (Lincoln) “A compass, I learned when I was surveying, it’ll, it’ll point you true north from where you’re standing, but it’s got no advice about the swamps, deserts, and chasms that you’ll encounter along the way. If in pursuit of your destination, you plunge ahead heedless of obstacles, and achieve nothing more than to sink in a swamp… what’s the use of knowing true north?”

Rank: List-Worthy

© 2024 S.G. Liput
792 Followers and Counting

Cabrini (2024)

15 Monday Apr 2024

Posted by sgliput in Christian, Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Biopic, Drama, History

(For Day 15 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was to write a poem inspired by the world of postage stamps. After looking around, I found that both Italy and the Vatican had issued stamps in honor of St. Frances Cabrini, a perfect tie-in for this inspiring film.)

How do you earn a statue,
Your face on a coin or a stamp?
Must you be
A celebrity,
An artist,
The smartest,
The latest
And greatest,
A leader,
Succeeder,
A vatic mindreader,
A champ?

Those are one way to be famous,
But somehow I’d rather prefer
To be more
Of an open door,
Be caring,
Forbearing,
Committed,
Quick-witted,
Be tender,
A mender,
And never surrender
Like her.
__________________________

MPA rating:  PG-13

I remember watching Christian films in the 2000s, usually direct-to-DVD affairs with overly preachy messaging and by-the-numbers plots of inspiration or admonishment. While Hollywood used to cater some of its offerings to audiences of faith (Ben-Hur, The Prince of Egypt), it seemed that their level of quality was out of reach, but not so anymore. Alejandro Gómez Monteverde was the first to turn the tide of faith-based filmmaking with his directorial debut Bella 18 years ago and now, working with Angel Studios, has raised the bar further with last year’s Sound of Freedom and his latest film Cabrini.

Released appropriately on International Women’s Day, the film is based on the life of Mother Frances Xavier Cabrini, the first American citizen to be canonized by the Catholic Church. Though plagued by tuberculosis, this humble Italian nun (played by the excellent Cristiana Dell’Anna) had a passion to serve overseas and, in 1889, was sent by the Pope (Giancarlo Giannini) to help the Italian immigrants in the slums of New York City. With limited support from the local archbishop (David Morse) and rampant racism directed toward the Italian population, she proved to be remarkably resourceful in establishing an orphanage, a hospital, and an example of resilience for all.

Hagiographic biopics about saints are hardly new, like for St. Bernadette (The Song of Bernadette), St. Joan of Arc (The Passion of Joan of Arc), or St. Joseph of Cupertino (The Reluctant Saint), but they’re increasingly rare in modern times. With striking cinematography and a realistically sober portrayal of 1800s immigrant hardship, Cabrini proves to be a praiseworthy production across the board. Seasoned actors like Giannini, Morse, and John Lithgow add gravitas to the casting, and Dell’Anna is outstanding as the lead, bristling at the repeated urgings to “stay where you belong” and pressing forward through faith and ingenuity. She represents the best kind of feminism, one that refuses to wilt under men’s underestimation and rises to serve others.

I found it a tad odd that the name of Jesus is never invoked, but I assume this was for the sake of catering to as wide an audience as possible. And with universal themes about kindness, perseverance, and the immigrant experience, Cabrini certainly feels like the kind of film that would appeal to any fan of historical drama, not just Christians or Catholics. I would like to think it deserves even Oscar consideration for Dell’Anna, Morse, and the cinematography, though I doubt the Academy would abide that. There will always be naysayers, but Cabrini exceeds the common pitfalls of faith-based cinema, and I would love for more films of its kind to flourish.

Best line: (Mother Cabrini) “We can serve our weakness or we can serve our purpose. Not both.”

Rank:  List-Worthy

© 2024 S.G. Liput
792 Followers and Counting

A Million Miles Away (2023)

08 Monday Apr 2024

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amazon, Biopic, Drama, History

(For Day 8 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was for a poem about a relationship between two people or things that should never have met. The encounter of an aspiring astronaut with the notoriously inhospitable vacuum of space seemed like a good odd couple to serve as inspiration.)
_________________________

Hello, space! I’ve waited.

You don’t know me, but I’m a fan.
I’ve loved you from afar.
You wink your stars at every man,
But only few can follow.
I know your history, your rules,
And where your dangers are.
But I can’t claim the finest schools
Or have much pride to swallow.

You’re wonderfully indifferent
To the differences in man.
You don’t say, “It’s an immigrant!
An indigent, so kill it!”
Oh, no, you want to kill us all
Quite equally, and can.
But knowing that will neither stall
Nor stop our trespass, will it?

I’ve only ever craved a chance
To challenge you up close,
To prove that I was worth your glance,
Your open invitation.
I dreamed the scheme at which they scoffed
And begged them more than most.
While they looked down, I looked aloft
To touch a constellation.

Hello, space! I made it.
_________________________

MPA rating:  PG

Hidden Figures became the gold standard for “inspiring true story of underrepresented group excelling and beating the odds,” particularly when it came to NASA. So perhaps that’s why A Million Miles Away didn’t make much of a splash upon its Amazon Prime Video release. It’s a shame, though, because this biopic of migrant-farm-worker-turned-astronaut José Hernández provides an exemplary dose of underdog aspiration and one of Michael Peña’s finest performances.

Hernández grew up in a migrant family picking grapes, but, through the wonder of Apollo 11 footage and the encouragement of a supportive teacher, the boy turns his gaze upward to the stars. Many people are forced to wait on their dreams, and the film shows how life goes on while Hernández made gradual steps toward being the person NASA wanted – meeting his wife Adela (excellent Rosa Salazar) and opening a restaurant even as he gets pilot experience and scuba certification. With his repeated applications and rejections to NASA’s training program, it’s a testament to the power of persistence, one that anyone with yet-distant dreams can admire.

A Million Miles Away excels as both space-program biopic and touching family drama, setting José’s achievements as the culmination of the journey to a better life undertaken by so many migrant workers. With its shuttle-era time period, it also prominently features the 2003 Columbia disaster, a tragedy rarely acknowledged in NASA-themed movies. Streaming releases are easy to write off as unworthy of big-screen attention, but this underdog story is well worth your time.

Best line: (José, to his cousin) “Who better than a migrant? Somebody that knows what it’s like to dive into the unknown. Who better than that… to dare leave this planet, man?”

Rank:  List Runner-Up (might be higher after a rewatch)

© 2024 S.G. Liput
791 Followers and Counting

2023 Blindspot Pick #3: London Road (2015)

21 Thursday Dec 2023

Posted by sgliput in Blindspot, Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Drama, History, Musical

Have you heard? Have you heard?
There are rumors running rampant.
Have you heard that there’s a murderer whose killing is undampened
By the increase in policemen
Or the neighborhood’s unease?
There’s a chance he could be anyone the average person sees.

No immunity for anyone
From danger or suspicion.
There’s a liar in our midst who lacks the basest inhibition.
Could be him. Could be her.
I won’t sleep until we know.
Though even when they’re caught, I fear the fear may not let go.
_______________________

Rating: TV-14 (equates to PG-13)

It’s no secret that I love musicals. I just said so in my last post. But that doesn’t mean I love all musicals by default; they have to earn it. An example of that love not coming easily is London Road, a 2015 drama based on a stage musical about the 2006 serial murders by the Suffolk Strangler, or rather about their impact on the surrounding Ipswich neighborhood. With the concept of a murder mystery musical and featuring actors like Olivia Coleman and Tom Hardy, I added the film to my Blindspot list with little other knowledge about it.

The locals of Ipswich were interviewed at the time about their fears and concerns about the murders, as were the sex workers being targeted by the killer, and the songs use this verbatim testimony as lyrics. Thus, all of the songs sound like real people speaking normally, complete with “um”s and “yeah”s and pauses that go with such realism. However, to make these interviews work as songs, there is quite a bit of repetition involved, hammering in less-than-eloquent points like “it’s ‘orrible, idn’t it, eh?” and “begonias and petunias and, um, impatiens and things.” Plus, this repetition is mostly done through talking along with the tune rather than actual singing, so if you thought Tom Hardy couldn’t sing, this won’t prove you wrong. The film’s cinematography tries to inject some visual interest into the musical numbers, but the lyric style largely yields rather dull songs that feel much longer than they are.

And yet I still rather appreciate London Road as an experiment, one that isn’t quite successful but still effective in its own way. It immortalizes these seemingly mundane conversations and frames them in a way that reflects how the community as a whole responds to tragedy, from doubt and fear to a desire for better things beyond. I probably wouldn’t listen to the songs on their own, but they often begin with that awkward talk-singing and actually do sound nice by the end as voices overlap amid violin or synthesizer. It’s highly unique, and I credit the inventiveness of the original play’s creators (Alecky Blythe and Adam Cork), as well as the producers of the film version for adapting a story Americans like me might not otherwise have been able to see on stage.

Rank: Honorable Mention

© 2023 S.G. Liput
785 Followers and Counting

Elvis (2022)

15 Saturday Apr 2023

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Biopic, Drama, History, Musical

(For Day 15 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was to write a poem praising a role model while suggesting doubt around their supposed reputation. A biopic seemed like an ideal choice for this topic, since they so often expose the seedier aspects of celebrities.)

When searching music history,
From madrigals to neo-soul,
Elvis Presley was expressly
Called the King of Rock and Roll.

That clearly means the genre must
Have started with his rise to fame.
Raucous singing, pelvic swinging –
Closely linked to Elvis’ name.

Is Elvis not the true foundation
Of the rock we now revere?
When your sound is that renowned,
He must have been the pioneer,
Or so I hear.
____________________

MPA rating: PG-13

At this point, I expect all successful musicians of yesteryear to eventually get a film exposing their struggles and faults. Honestly, I’m surprised it took this long for Elvis Presley to get the Hollywood biopic treatment (not counting incidental narratives like Elvis & Nixon), but director Baz Luhrmann certainly went all out to finally make the King’s story into a flashy blockbuster. Framed as a deathbed recollection of Elvis’ infamously controlling manager Colonel Tom Parker (Tom Hanks), the story recounts Elvis’ life from his early fascination with African-American gospel music to his 1968 Christmas special comeback to his restrictive Las Vegas residency.

As I think most people acknowledge, the real star here is Austin Butler, who plays Elvis to perfection with an effortless drawl and swagger yet still makes him feel like a real person in a way old performance footage often doesn’t. It’s one of those rare ideal matches between star and subject that every biopic dreams of finding. And while Tom Hanks has gotten plenty of flak for his fake Dutch(?) accent, even winning two Razzies for the role, I thought he did a fine job, striking a convincing balance between fondness for “his boy” and the greed and anxiety of not wanting to lose control of his cash cow.

What felt more divisive than Hanks’s performance is Luhrmann’s direction, pumping as much visual glitz and bustle into each second as possible. The camera swoops and swirls with fever-dream abandon and rarely rests on any one scene for very long, further punctuated by anachronistic music, I suppose chosen to show Elvis’ continuing impact on modern music, even though rap tends to clash with 1950s Memphis. Yet as the film progressed, the drama and conflict between Elvis and Parker become more pronounced, and the direction likewise settles into a more serious mode that supports the emotional moments toward the end. I’m discovering that this is apparently a Luhrmann trend, since I recall Strictly Ballroom having a similar tonal switch from a first half I hated to a second half I loved. I suppose a strong ending is preferable to the alternative, but his style does take some getting used to.

That being said, Elvis does right by its iconic namesake, highlighting his stage presence and vocal power so closely replicated by Butler, who absolutely deserved his Best Actor nomination (though I am happy for Brendan Fraser’s win). His stunning rendition of “If I Can Dream” and the closing integration of “Unchained Melody” with real footage are especially brilliant. While it’s overlong and sidesteps some of his failings, like marital infidelity, the film shines a light on many details I never knew about the King of Rock and Roll and will likely become the de facto cinematic version of his story.

Best line: (Elvis) “A reverend once told me, ‘When things are too dangerous to say, sing.’”

Rank: List Runner-Up

© 2023 S.G. Liput
784 Followers and Counting

The Mercy (2018)

06 Thursday Apr 2023

Posted by sgliput in Movies, NaPoWriMo, Poetry, Reviews, Writing

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Biopic, Drama, History

(For Day 6 of NaPoWriMo, the prompt was to base a poem off of some other poem in a different language from the Poetry International website, drawing inspiration from the sounds and letters. I used “Jailhouse Haikus” by Basque poet Kirmen Uribe, and tried to mimic the flow of the sounds while tying the meaning to this film about an unfortunate sailor.)

Bane of chart and map,
Against which straight courses drift –
An ignorant man.

Hang on and look out,
Bet and build and don’t compare –
Better to just dare.

Look, the open sea.
I’ll sail, only heart speaking.
Error? I care not.
_________________________

MPA rating: PG-13

We’re so used to underdog biopics being tales of misjudged heroes overcoming adversity and earning their place in history over all the naysayers. Think Rudy, Rocky, and The Rookie. After all, why would anyone want to watch an underdog story that doesn’t end happily? That is the question I was left with after seeing The Mercy, a biographical drama starring Colin Firth as amateur sailor Donald Crowhurst. In the late 1960s, Crowhurst came up with a ship design that he felt confident could win the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race, in which sailors would circumnavigate the globe alone on their yachts. The first half of the film has all the hallmarks of an inspirational history lesson, with Crowhurst betting his home and his business on one crazy idea he believes he can make happen, yet it’s no spoiler for anyone familiar with the notorious tale that things do not go as planned.

I debated whether or not to disclose the film’s ultimately sad turn, but I felt it was worth including, and it’s hardly a secret when looking up the movie. As an American, I had never heard of Crowhurst’s story and so was not expecting the ultimate tragedy of the tale. It’s a sad and open-ended account in real life, so the same is true for the film, which tries to fill in some gaps with speculations beyond the logs Crowhurst left behind. I will credit Firth, as well as Rachel Weisz as his devoted wife Clare, both of whom give excellent and nuanced performances. There is a place for tragic heroism and stories that remind us that well-intentioned hubris is no guarantee of success, if only to contrast with the overabundance of stories telling us the opposite. It’s just hard not to be disappointed at the reminder.

Best line: (Sir Francis Chichester, famed sailor) “To only do what has been done before is to live one’s life in the shadow of other men.”

Rank: Dishonorable Mention

© 2023 S.G. Liput
784 Followers and Counting

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • We Didn’t Start 2025 (Recap)
  • NaPoWriMo 2025 Recap (Finally)
  • Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (2024)
  • It Happened One Night (1934)
  • Spellbound (2024)

Recent Comments

associatesofshellymann's avatarassociatesofshellyma… on My Top Twelve La La La So…
Kit's avatarKit Nichols on Bonnie and Clyde (1967)
lifelessons's avatarlifelessons on Look Back (2024)
Carol Jackson's avatarCarol Jackson on The Thief of Bagdad (1940…
Stephen's avatarStephen on Love Story (1970)

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Blindspot
  • Blogathon
  • Christian
  • Movies
  • Music
  • NaPoWriMo
  • Poetry
  • Reviews
  • TV
  • Writing

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • We Didn’t Start 2025 (Recap)
  • NaPoWriMo 2025 Recap (Finally)
  • Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (2024)
  • It Happened One Night (1934)
  • Spellbound (2024)

Recent Comments

associatesofshellymann's avatarassociatesofshellyma… on My Top Twelve La La La So…
Kit's avatarKit Nichols on Bonnie and Clyde (1967)
lifelessons's avatarlifelessons on Look Back (2024)
Carol Jackson's avatarCarol Jackson on The Thief of Bagdad (1940…
Stephen's avatarStephen on Love Story (1970)

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Blindspot
  • Blogathon
  • Christian
  • Movies
  • Music
  • NaPoWriMo
  • Poetry
  • Reviews
  • TV
  • Writing

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Is this your new site? Log in to activate admin features and dismiss this message
Log In
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Rhyme and Reason
    • Join 814 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Rhyme and Reason
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...