(Today’s NaPoWriMo prompt was for a fan letter, and I knew just the film.)
Dear Mr. Lucas,
I thought I would write you a letter to say
That my miserable life was fulfilled on the day
That I first saw that brilliant creation of yours:
That glorious franchise you christened Star Wars.
I know every line, every creature and place.
I can name every extra-terrestrial face.
I love Figrin D’an, who played in Mos Eisley,
And ol’ Ponda Baba, who didn’t choose wisely,
And Porkins and Bossk and Salacious B. Crumb.
I know them all more than I know my own thumb.
In details and lore, I am masterfully versed,
And though you deny, I know Solo shot first.
I know set design secrets and last-minute edits
And every last name that goes by in the credits.
I quote every movie by heart easily;
I even like Episodes I, II, and III.
You must see that I am a passionate fan
Of the greatest of tales in the annals of man.
The Force is with me, as I know it’s with you,
So I ask only one little favor to do.
Would you cancel that order, as if I’m a threat,
That needlessly dictates how close I can get?
______________________
MPAA rating: PG-13
I’m not quite as big a Star Wars fan as the poem indicates, but I love it enough to enjoy a good comedy about it. Fanboys isn’t it. What could have been an enjoyable road movie poking fun at obsessive fan bases turned out to be a crude and unflattering dud.
When four sophomoric fans learn that one of their own will die of cancer before the release of Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace, they decide to travel to Skywalker Ranch and steal a copy of the film. Some of the jokes aimed at Star Wars are actually funny, but the rest languish in awkward silliness. Should I laugh at an Ewok humping someone’s leg? One running gag is the feud between fans of Star Wars and Star Trek, which is ramped up to ridiculous levels. (I’ve never really understood the rivalry there, since I like both franchises.) Ultimately, the best thing about Fanboys is some unexpected cameos.
Aside from much of the film just not being funny, its treatment of fans is actually rather insulting. The group of friends includes mostly immature nerds of the type who have no experience with the opposite gender. Their pathetic antics are rather desperate, and eventually fanboys are literally equated with sex-starved bums. Weren’t the filmmakers actually targeting Star Wars fans as their audience? I’m sure they didn’t mean all fans are like that, but the characterization remains. Fanboys has a decent concept but poor execution, so for a good fan-related comedy, watch Galaxy Quest instead.
Best line: (Zoe, as someone is talking to George Lucas on the phone) “I can hear his beard!”
(Today’s NaPoWriMo prompt was to involve a family portrait. I went a little unorthodox and saw a movie heirloom as a different kind of portrait.)
Photographs fade with the passing of time.
Families usually settle for that.
But one family has a sturdier portrait:
A weathered piano where fathers have sat.
One gifted forefather made art from the wood
And carved images of his daughter and wife
And kept right on carving as long as he could,
Remembering many a long-faded life.
There that piano sits, solid as ever.
The faces hewn into its surface still stare,
And when someone plays on those ivory keys,
The faces almost seem to whisper a prayer.
Now some fail to see that piano as more
Than a heavy old relic with stale memories,
But portraits, pianos, and relics can store
Significance only their family sees.
____________________
MPAA rating: PG
The Piano Lesson is a Hallmark Hall of Fame movie adapted from the all-black Broadway play by August Wilson. Several of the actors from the play grace the screen as well, including Charles S. Dutton and Carl Gordon (who also co-starred on the ‘90s TV show Roc). Dutton plays Boy Willie, who visits his sister Berniece (Alfre Woodard) in Pittsburgh in order to sell her antique piano for land.
What The Piano Lesson has is a debate-worthy dilemma of the best kind. As I described in the poem, the piano is carved with images of their ancestors, dating back to slavery, the kind of keepsake that Berniece could never imagine parting with. Yet Boy Willie views its worth in monetary terms: if he can sell it (and the truckful of watermelons he brought along), he can return to the South and buy the very land their ancestors once worked as slaves. The piano is a gift, but is it one to be kept and admired, or used to benefit the family? Both Berniece and Boy Willie have good points, so who’s right?
The Piano Lesson is also a warm picture of African-Americans in the 1930s. At first glance, the politically correct might disapprove of the poor dialect and grammar spoken, names like Boy Willie or Wining Boy, or the sight of black people with watermelons. Yet August Wilson himself was black and included such elements for a reason. After all, Boy Willie is showing initiative and business savvy by selling the watermelons and seeks to keep on progressing away from slavery. Religion, superstition, and music are also elemental to the story, with an a cappella rendition of “Berta, Berta” being a highlight.
All of the actors give great performances, but the story itself doesn’t quite know how to resolve its provocative argument. The culmination of the dispute takes a supernatural turn that is not well visualized and ends up just confusing. Even so, I’m glad the playwright sided with my opinion on how the piano ought to be used. The Piano Lesson might have ended better, but it’s a thought-provoking portrait of African-American heritage.
(Today’s NaPoWriMo prompt was for a lune, a haiku variant with a 5-3-5 syllable scheme, and I ended up stringing three together.)
What you see on screens
Is half of
What’s behind the scenes.
Each proud, polished face
On the news
Most fears their disgrace.
The best journalists
Never change
Truth as it exists.
________________________
MPAA rating: R (for language)
Broadcast News can be summed up in one word: professional. It’s a professionally created film about professionals. It’s also a good reminder that television news isn’t as simple as what we see, a few well-dressed anchors reading the headlines. There’s also toil and creativity and last-minute changes and sudden updates and delays and unbridled panic behind the scenes.
A love triangle forms our comprehensive tour of the news studio. Jane Craig (Holly Hunter) is an impassioned woman-on-the-edge producer and enjoys working with Aaron (Albert Brooks), whose encyclopedic knowledge and quick wit make him an ideal reporter. Then comes Tom Grunick (William Hurt) as a newly hired anchor who knows he’s unqualified but still presents well to the camera. Jane is first and foremost a career woman, but Tom attracts her even while testing her staunchly held opinions.
It’s prime acting across the board, with all three leads earning Oscar nominations, and Albert Brooks delivers some terrifically trenchant retorts. I also like how much is tested in the high-pressure news business – ethics, ambitions, competence, loyalty – and in believable, often amusing ways.
Broadcast News has plenty of strengths, but it couldn’t stick the landing. I suppose in trying to stand out from rom com clichés, the love triangle went in the one direction that leaves everyone unsatisfied. It’s an example of being unnecessarily sadder but wiser. What’s worse, as more time passes, I’ve come to realize just how forgettable the film overall is. With the exception of one funny epic fail scene, very little stands out in retrospect, which isn’t flattering for a Best Picture nominee. Broadcast News is as professional as the real TV news networks, but I’m unsure which I’d rather watch again. Probably the film; it’s less depressing.
Best line: (Aaron, to Jane) “I’ll meet you at the place near the thing where we went that time.”
Once again, April is about here, and it’s not just Jazz Appreciation Month or Mathematics Awareness Month. It’s National Poetry Writing Month, a.k.a. NaPoWriMo, and that means a challenge for poets to write a poem every day. My posts have gotten more and more infrequent lately, sometimes only two a week, but I’ll be doing just what I did last April. A poem a day means a movie review a day too, and that will help me catch up on some of the backlog of films I’ve seen but not reviewed. I’ve also noticed a few of my posts have been getting rather long, so I’ll be keeping these relatively short, which will help when I may not have much to say about some of them.
I may fall behind in my posts, but NaPoWriMo is supposed to be fun. The prompts for each day often test one’s creativity, and April’s the perfect month to celebrate poetry. Happy NaPoWriMo! 🙂
Here’s my review for MovieRob’s March Genre Grandeur of Heist Films. I went Victorian with The Great Train Robbery, featuring the great Sean Connery and the great Donald Sutherland.
Due to the Jewish holiday of Passover which falls out this year at the end of April, I will be mostly unavailable for a week, so I decided to postpone GG until May.
May’s Genre has been chosen by Damien of Riley Central. We will be reviewing our favorite Adventure Movies.
Please get me your submissions by the 25th of May by sending them to damienadventure@movierob.net Try to think out of the box! Great choice Damien!
Be sure to vote for your favorite young adult movie in the latest Opinion Battle at Movie Reviews 101! I picked the beloved ’80s comedy Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, but there are good choices aplenty.
Opinion Battles Round 6 Favourite Young Adult Movie
With Divergent: Allegiant hitting the cinemas I think it would be a great choice to look at our favourite Young Adult movies because let’s face it we get as many of these as we do superhero movies. The films are usually designed to be a series from a set of books. So what is the most popular Young Adult film?
If you want to take part in Opinion Battles we will be looking at Worst Remake, the closing date for choices will be Sunday 3rd April 2016 you can send you choice to moviereviews101@yahoo.co.uk
Darren – Movie Reviews 101
Odd Thomas
Odd Thomas is from a series of books by Dean Koontz which follows Odd Thomas as he tries to help the recently deceased pass over, he also has to deal with the demons of the afterlife. Odd works with his girlfriend…
I’ve not beheld a parted sea
Or outlived an emergency.
I’ve never seen a patient healed
Or glimpsed divine eternity.
I’ve never viewed a battlefield
With some celestial might revealed.
I wish I had, for maybe then
My faith in God would be more sealed.
Despite the things beyond my ken,
I’ve seen the warmth and faith of men,
And maybe that’s a miracle
Worth noticing time and again.
______________________
MPAA rating: PG
I had considered watching Risen or The Young Messiah for Easter, but the only faith-based film with a good show time (and an A+ CinemaScore) was Miracles from Heaven, which I’m rather glad I ended up seeing. I wasn’t won over by Heaven Is For Real, the previous film from producers T.D. Jakes and Joe Roth; it was an intriguing story but not one to sustain a full-length film, and the conflict felt forced coming from supposed people of faith. While that film showed a child’s heavenly vision early on and focused on people’s reactions, Miracles from Heaven does better in leaving it for the climax and focusing on a more relatable crisis of faith, with a far better chance for both smiles and tears.
Based on the true story of the Beam family from Burleson, Texas, the film depicts the family of five as real people whose faith is just one part of their lives. The parents flirt with each other; one daughter is obsessed with Taylor Swift; and another has a passion for soccer championships. Tragedy is the last thing they expect or deserve. Jennifer Garner outdoes herself as Christy Beam, who lives every parent’s worst nightmare when her daughter Anna (Kylie Rogers) is diagnosed with a severe and incurable gastrointestinal disease. Already stressed financially, she must endure constant worry, hospital waiting lists, incompetent doctors who won’t do more, competent doctors who can’t do more, and a host of unanswered prayers. Skeptics aren’t the only ones who question the goodness of God when bad things happen, and Christy’s faith becomes buried in feelings of grief and abandonment. Why did this have to happen to a sweet little girl? No one can offer her answers.
Obviously, the title indicates that something miraculous happens, but it’s more than that. In following this mother and daughter to their darkest point, moments of light shine out the brighter. Queen Latifah plays a kind waitress who befriends them while away from home and offers needed comic relief, and Eugenio Derbez is splendid as a Patch Adams-style child specialist who balances cheerful encouragement with inner knowledge that most of his patients will die. In these and many more side characters, the film reminds us that big miracles come from God, but small ones can originate in those random acts of kindness of which anyone is capable.
Doubt is everyone’s first reaction to miracles, and the film doesn’t forget that, nor does it try to explain why some people are so blessed while others are not. Miracles are rare but no less extraordinary, and for those willing, the unexplainable can remind people of hope when they have none. Miracles from Heaven has a few moments of familiar Christian themes that might get atheists rolling their eyes, but it’s an inspiring, well-acted, and emotional tale with which anyone who believes or hopes in miracles can identify.
Best line: (Christy) “Miracles are God’s way of telling us He’s here.”
I know this list will probably have less wide appeal than my usual lists and reviews, but I am a Christian and wanted to do something in honor of Lent and Holy Week. At first, I thought I’d do a list of Christian movies, but the sad truth is that most Christian films just don’t compare with “regular” cinema as far as quality and are often written off as preachy. (For the record, that list would have been topped by The Passion of the Christ, The Nativity Story, and Sheffey.)
So, upon second thought, I decided to count down my favorites of the Christian music scene, which surpasses movies in actually matching its secular counterpart. While many Christian songs rely on inspiring lyrics over a rather bland sound, my choices below feature unique instrumentation and catchy rhythms that can stand toe to toe with much of what’s on the radio nowadays, IMO. In fact, if not for the religious lyrics, these songs would probably be much bigger hits, and some of the artists actually have enjoyed crossover appeal. These are songs that I would gladly listen to whether they’re Christian or not, but the fact that they feature uplifting lyrics is icing on the cake. I’m only including one placement per band, and I’m not counting superficially Christian songs like ”Spirit in the Sky” or songs from musicals like Jesus Christ Superstar, Godspell, or The Prince of Egypt(though I love those too). Whether you’re a Christian or not, I have no doubt that there’s a song here for everyone to enjoy.
“Hallelujah” from The Call (2016) – Joy Enriquez
Joy Enriquez jumped from a backup singer to a solo artist over a decade ago, and one of her most recent digital releases is now a personal favorite of mine. With some background violin courtesy of Lindsey Stirling, “Hallelujah” is an instant modern classic of praise, and the homey music video is just plain sweet.
“Beat the System” from Beat the System (1985) – Petra
Just as many recent Christian rock songs don’t appear much different from the usual radio fare, the Christian songs of the ‘80s had the same ‘80s sound. Petra was the shining example of a hit Christian band back then and a favorite of my mom’s. While their style has evolved over the years, my favorite is the Journey-like “Beat the System,” boasting a video replete with early MTV imagery. “The Battle Belongs to the Lord” is also another great song of theirs.
TIE:
“Believe” from One (2004) – Andy Chrisman
“Can’t Keep a Good Man Down” from Pictures on Mantles (2004) – Russ Lee
I got both of these albums as gifts around the same time and played them to death while doing my homework. These two songs (probably the most evangelical on the list) are the standouts. “Believe” is one of those uplifting professions of faith that gets people testifying and just barely edged out “Complete” from the same album.
Not to be confused with the Alabama hit, “Can’t Keep a Good Man Down” is also a Christian single from Russ Lee, who left the band Newsong to go solo. Before returning as their lead singer, his solo efforts delivered underrated beauties like “Pictures on Mantles” and “Living Life Upside Down.” “Can’t Keep a Good Man Down” is the best, though, with its blend of acoustic and electric guitar and country-ish beat. Sadly, I couldn’t find his solo version of the song, but the slightly altered version from when he rejoined Newsong is still great.
“Call My Name” from Revelation (2004) – Third Day
Third Day is one of the biggest bands in contemporary Christian music, thanks in part to the husky voice of lead singer Mac Powell. “Call My Name” is their masterpiece with an encouraging message second to none.
“My Last Amen” from Ending Is Beginning (2008) – downhere
Having a completely different, almost quirky vibe compared with most of these songs, “My Last Amen” from Canadian band downhere is just a fun song worth singing along to. It also has drawn some comparisons to the music of Queen.
“Beating My Heart” from OK Now (2008) – Jon McLaughlin
This energizing hit may not be an exclusively Christian song, since it climbed through both Christian and secular Billboard charts, but it’s a good example of how lyrics can be written to appeal to both audiences. The words might refer to God or to a romance, and McLaughlin’s high voice lends “Beating My Heart” a Coldplay-style quality.
“Give It All to You” from Yellow Cavalier (2009) – Yellow Cavalier (now Anthem Lights)
Why this song isn’t more well-known I don’t know, except that Yellow Cavalier promptly changed their name to Anthem Lights after this one EP. “Give It All to You” has a swelling, dance-worthy rhythm with some fantastic background trumpets at the end.
“Alive Again” from Alive Again (2009) – Matt Maher
As far as straight, rousing inspiration that could get hands raised in praise, few can compare with “Alive Again.” The Canadian Catholic Matt Maher won the Dove Award for Songwriter of the Year last year, and it’s clear that his musical talents are still going strong.
“Galaxies” from All Things Bright and Beautiful (2011) – Owl City
The best example of a Christian artist with crossover appeal would have to be Owl City, aka Adam Young. His electronic stylings have graced films like Wreck-It Ralph and Legend of the Guardians (I knew I could work in some movie references!), and songs like “Good Time” and “Fireflies” are still played semi-regularly on pop stations. One of his best songs looks upward to the galaxies and the glory of God, with Young’s uniquely offbeat lyrics and strong synthesizer at play.
“Dive” from Speechless (1999) – Steven Curtis Chapman
“Dive” is the kind of energetic earworm that gets a crowd excited, starting slow and then bopping along with increasing buoyancy. I remember being scared stiff on a high diving board at camp as a kid, but this song could have had me leaping for joy.
“Hard to Believe” from VOTA (2008) – VOTA
After changing their name from Casting Pearls, VOTA gave the world this awesome track along with one of my favorite music videos ever. This song is meant to be sung along with and deserves so much more air time than it’s gotten. The groovy syncopation matches the kaleidoscopic video, and I never get tired of it.
TIE:
“Way Beyond Myself” from Born Again (2010) and
“Stay Strong” from The Greatest Hits (2007) – Newsboys
I confidently assert that the Newsboys are the greatest Christian rock band. Since their formation in Australia in the 1980s, they’ve supplied so many hits that I could probably do a top twelve list of just their songs (“Shine,” “Take Me to Your Leader,” “The Way We Roll,” “In the Hands of God,” “In the Belly of the Whale,” and “Escape,” for example). Their style is so varied and distinctive that it’s too bad that their song “God’s Not Dead” got its own movie instead of their greater work. It’s a good song (and so-so movie) but far from their best.
My top spot is shared by two different but equally deserving tracks. “Stay Strong” has the best lyrics, inspiring and devout while its melody matches perfectly, especially the synthesizer bridge proclaiming “This race can be won!” On the other hand, “Way Beyond Myself” places the fast-paced beat as the star, the kind that gets a huge crowd undoubtedly pumped. One is a heart-winner, and the other’s a head-banger. Together, these two songs exemplify the greatest strengths of contemporary Christian music.
Runners-Up (quite a few, in alphabetical order by artist):
“My Savior My God” – Aaron Shust
“Breath of Heaven” – Amy Grant
“Kings and Queens” – Audio Adrenaline
“What Life Would Be Like” – Big Daddy Weave
“Give Me Your Eyes” – Brandon Heath
“Where I Belong” – Building 429
“Jesus, Take the Wheel” and “Something in the Water” – Carrie Underwood (another good example of crossover with country music)
“More of You” – Colton Dixon
“Shine” – David Crowder Band (really beautiful and unique stop-motion video)
“Dear X (You Don’t Own Me)” – Disciple (the hardest rock song in the list)
“Oh Happy Day” – Edwin Hawkins Singers
“It’s Not Over Yet” – for KING & COUNTRY
“Christmas with a Capital C” – Go Fish
“Alive” – Hillsong Young and Free
“The River” – Jordan Feliz
“He Is with You” – Mandisa
“The Motions” – Matthew West
“Move” and “You Reign” – MercyMe
“Lay ‘em Down” – NEEDTOBREATHE
“Remember” – Passion
“Be Still, My Soul” – The Imperials
“Therapy” – Relient K
“Forgiven” – Sanctus Real
“The Words I Would Say” and “Live Like That” – Sidewalk Prophets
“Something Holy” – Stellar Kart
“Stand in the Rain” – Superchick
“You Are More” – Tenth Avenue North
“City on Our Knees” – TobyMac
With Easter around the corner, I think the best way to end this post is with the ultimate uplifting Gospel song, “He’s Alive” by the Gaither Vocal Band with David Phelps. Hallelujah and Amen!
Up and up they build the tower;
Up and up ambition leads.
Further down, foundations sour
As equality recedes.
Bitter grows the patient base
And richer grows the wealthy crest.
Neither’s happy with their place,
And both believe that they know best.
Social dangers of the past
Are pains mankind will not outgrow.
In the future, race and caste
Are rifts we still must overthrow.
____________________
MPAA rating for 1927 Metropolis: Not Rated (should be PG)
MPAA rating for 2001 Metropolis: PG-13
This will be the beginning of a new feature called Cartoon Comparisons, in which I will compare and contrast a live-action and animated film that share plot elements or source material. I didn’t realize it at the time, but my first stab at this was my double review of Ordinary People and Colorful, after which I discovered several other pairs of films to consider. For this Cartoon Comparison, I’ll be tackling the silent-era German classic Metropolis and the 2001 anime adaptation, also called Metropolis.
I haven’t seen a great many silent films, but most seem to be relatively short so as not to overstay their welcome. Fritz Lang’s Metropolis, at least in its most restored version, clocks in at nearly 2½ hours, a daunting runtime that’s long by talkie standards. Until recently, my only exposure to Metropolis was in Queen’s music video for “Radio Ga Ga,” which shows many of the film’s most impressive special effects, expansive skylines with tiny moving vehicles and floating ships that still beg the question “How did they do that in the 1920s?!” The art deco set design is consistently impressive so that even if some viewers start getting bored, architectural enthusiasts shouldn’t. Being familiar with only the film’s visual style, I was surprised at the high-minded plot, which includes a despotic industrialist, his sympathetic son Freder, a peace-urging love interest named Maria, and a mad scientist who creates a robot to become Maria’s evil doppelganger.
The film clearly owes its classic status to its interesting story and memorable imagery, but the usual complaints and conventions of black-and-white silent pictures apply, even more than usual due to its length. When characters are in love or shock, they hold their hands over their heart; when they’re tired, they conspicuously wipe their brow; when they’re scared, they practically have a seizure. Brigitte Helm does double duty as both the demure, angelic Maria and her wicked robot copy, who indulges in weirdly reptilian movements and is over-literally equated with the Whore of Babylon.
Despite the silent-era excesses (like most of the men wearing lipstick), many elements still hold resonance. Some are visually striking, such as Maria being chased by a flashlight’s glow, the flooding of the worker city, and the climactic fight with shades of The Hunchback of Notre Dame. One of the most notable social aspects was the tension between the poor working class and the wealthy elite, led by Freder’s father. The evil Maria takes advantage of the oppressed workers to incite riots and impulsive fury, which cause more problems and grief than they fix. Even in 1927, before Hitler’s Germany or more recent threats of rioting, Metropolis served as a warning against blind proletarian rage in favor of understanding on both sides. It’s a drawn-out, melodramatic test of one’s patience but one ultimately worthy of all the critical appreciation.
Now for the 2001 anime film of the same name. This Metropolis is based on the 1927 film but has its roots in a 1949 manga of the same name, which has little-to-no connection with Fritz Lang’s story. There’s still a bustling metropolis, parallels to the Tower of Babel, a mad scientist, societal turmoil, and a robotic girl, but despite some set design toward the end that pays homage to the original film, the story is its own. Other similarities are owed to the film’s production team. Many of the cartoonish character designs with big eyes and bigger noses seem as if they had been plucked from Astro Boy, due to the involvement of Tezuka Productions, which was founded by Astro Boy’s creator. In addition, the script was written by Katsuhiro Otomo, which explains traces of his cult favorite Akira, such as the distinct character motivations, political uprising amid catastrophic danger, and runaway power resulting in eye-popping destruction.
The Metropolis anime still has the social tension between classes, but this becomes secondary to the tension between humans and machines. It is robots who are relegated to the lowest levels of Metropolis, and distrust of machines runs rampant. Instead of a robotic harlot to sow dissent, the central android is a young girl named Tima, commissioned by a power-hungry duke but found first by a detective’s nephew who believes her to be human. The duke’s adopted son vows to hunt her down even as she questions her own identity.
This version of Metropolis is unlikely to leave anyone bored, and the animation is as polished and spectacular as any anime I’ve seen, albeit with a more sci-fi sheen than the films of Studio Ghibli. As a fan of futuristic cityscapes, Roger Ebert even called it “one of the best animated films [he’d] ever seen.” Like the original Metropolis, much of its power lies in the visuals: enormous fish swimming through the transparent wall of a high-rise office, a threatening stand-off as snow begins to fall, and especially the explosive climax set to a bizarrely fitting Ray Charles song.
Like Akira, Metropolis was meant to be a game-changer for anime, and the skill on display does not disappoint. What it lacks is a bit more focus on characters. The villain’s machinations are left rather vague, while the key relationship between the boy and the robot girl could have used more depth. I liked how their bond was tested, but by the end, the closing scenes don’t seem quite as optimistic as they try to be. These complaints are still quibbles, since the characters are still more engaging than in Akira.
It’s no surprise that a film with so much more action, color, and sound is far more entertaining than a silent picture from 1927. Lang’s Metropolis was the forerunner, the seed of so many other futuristic films since, while the animated Metropolis is like the vibrant blooming of its influence on animation worldwide. Both are must-sees for fans of science fiction cinema.
Best line from the 1927 Metropolis: (the closing title card, echoing Maria) “The mediator between head and hands must be the heart!”
Best line from the 2001 Metropolis: (Atlas) “It’s our emotions. They vibrate, and all we can do is move forward within that amplitude. But without affirming them, we can’t survive.”
There once was a couple steadfast
Who danced on the floor unsurpassed,
Till, thrilled by the groove,
The man busted a move,
And every last judge was aghast.
They groaned and bemoaned the upstart.
They claimed he disgraced their whole art.
Yet those like the pair
Who were willing to dare
Realized they didn’t care
About outlawing flair
And let them keep dancing their heart.
________________
MPAA rating: PG
Have you ever started watching a movie and knew from the first ten minutes that you didn’t care for it, and then, by unexpected degrees, warmed up to it until you realized that you did actually like it? I can’t think of another time when that was the case, but that was my experience with Strictly Ballroom, the first film from Australian director Baz Luhrmann. I’ve only seen his rather forgettable version of The Great Gatsby (the second half of which was better than the first), but Strictly Ballroom is his most critically acclaimed film, with a Rotten Tomatoes score of 95%.
Centered on Australian competitive ballroom dancing long before Dancing with the Stars, the movie starts out as a garish mockumentary, detailing the unconventional style of dancing favorite Scott Hastings (Paul Mercurio) and trying to paint his haughty mother and the judges as unbearably pretentious. The gaudy close-ups and quirky editing were probably meant to be comedic and cater to Luhrmann’s penchant for flashiness, but it just comes off as bad acting and direction.
I was about ready to write it off as not for me, but I stayed with it. I watched as Scott was approached by the ugly duckling of the dance academy Fran (Tara Morice). I watched as their unlikely partnership bloomed into romance and Fran’s Spanish family showed their dancing chops. (There are Spanish people in Australia. Who knew?) I watched as Scott was torn between winning a competition for his sheepish father’s sake or dancing for himself and Fran. The whole movie just kept improving until I was left pleased and cheered by the finished product. The choreography was excellent, and certain scenes with Scott and Fran seemed to have a memorable quality, as if they should be much more famous and iconic.
Why did it have to start so poorly? I’ve read that the film plays with stereotypes, but the beginning employed a stylistic choice that fell flat, in my opinion, and persisted in the insufferable authority figures who refused to allow Scott’s personal dance choices. While they were consistently grating, I did appreciate how his foe’s stance was explained as both uncertainty at what would be acceptable or able to win and cutthroat greed to protect a “sport” that had become an industry.
Either way, I wouldn’t watch Strictly Ballroom for the antagonists. Scott and Fran and their dancing are the core of the film and an endearing cinematic example of the whole “follow your heart” cliché. My ranking it as List Runner-Up rather than List-Worthy lies mainly in the beginning’s shortcomings and the fact that it wasn’t very funny for a comedy, but another viewing could easily raise my opinion. Strictly Ballroom is a prime example of why you should finish what you start; it just might surprise you.
Best line: (Fran, with a quote that seems like it should be more famous too) “A life lived in fear is a life half lived.”
![[ File # csp10082355, License # 2251352 ] Licensed through http://www.canstockphoto.com in accordance with the End User License Agreement (http://www.canstockphoto.com/legal.php) (c) Can Stock Photo Inc. / jorgophotography](https://sgliput.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/heist.jpg)
Rhyme and Reason 